Southern California Regional VA Policy Revised to Allow for Medical Marijuana Use with Opioids

4/22/16: DEA Approves Cannabis Study Aimed at Treating Veterans with PTSD

5/21/15: Senators, Including Feinstein, Approve Amendment Allowing Vets to Use Medical Marijuana

5/15/15: Combination Of Medical Marijuana, Opioids Does Not Increase Substance Abuse Risk, Study Finds

March 10, 2015 - In response to months of effort from California NORML, Veterans for Medical Cannabis Access, affiliated groups and Congressional offices, Cal NORML has been informed that VISN-22 policy has been revised to allow the use of medical marijuana with opioid prescriptions at all VA facilities in the Southern California region.

The new policy states:

If the UDS detects marijuana, and the patient participates in a State medical marijuana program, the provider and patient will discuss the various options and information available, including the safety risk associated with concurrent use. The patient and provider will then make a shared decision as to what direction the non-malignant pain will be managed.

Providers concurring in providing opioids in patients participating in a State medical marijuana program, must follow procedures that include a signed “Medical Marijuana Patient Use Agreement” and a “Concomitant Use of Opioids/Medical Marijuana Note”, documenting that any contraindications have been addressed and validating patient is enrolled in a State medical marijuana program.

Patients may appeal a provider decision not to provide opioid in a patient participating in a State medical marijuana program, by following the procedure outlined in “Network-Wide Policy for Clinical Appeals”; 2002-7.

The chief of staff at each VHA is responsible for implementation and monitoring of compliance with the policy.

Cal NORML began receiving phone calls last fall from veterans impacted by a policy directive issued by former VISN-22 acting chief Jeffrey Gering stating that any patient using medical marijuana would be tapered off their pain medications. Callers included a paratrooper injured in a training exercise who was denied his pain meds at Loma Linda hospital on Christmas eve, and a 70-year-old former pilot injured in a forced landing while in service.

Since the policy was in direct conflict with national VA policy allowing doctors to determine the best course of treatment in medical marijuana states, Michael Krawitz of VCMA put the national ethics committee of the VA in touch with Gering's office, reportedly gaining assurance that the policy would be changed just before Thanksgiving. However no change took place and Cal NORML deputy director Ellen Komp spent much of the month of January in the Southern California area visiting VA hospitals with veterans and reaching out to activist groups and Congressional offices. San Diego activists (pictured) helped bring about opposition from the Veterans Democratic Club of San Diego County.

"I hope and expect that this policy change will mean better care for veterans in the Southern California region who choose to use medical marijuana to augment their pain management regimen," said Komp. She thanked all who worked towards making this policy change, in particular David Zink of Long Beach VA Patient Experience Council, and Michael Krawitz of VCMA. In addition Marcus Boyd of San Diego ASA, himself a veteran, mounted a petition that gathered over 20,000 signatures in support of a policy change.

Already NORML has received word that one veteran's doctors have told him he will be denied despite the change in policy. The new policy contains a means by which veterans can appeal any denial of medication. Other services, such as PTSD psychotherapy programs and anxiety medications, have also been denied due to medical marijuana use. This is highly ironic since to many, cannabis is helpful with PTSD and anxiety.

Cal NORML urges all to write their Congressional representatives in support of the Veterans Equal Access Act, which would allow VA doctors to recommend medical marijuana to their patients.


While providing access is paramount, the need to outlaws discriminatory drug testing. If medical cannibus is medicine and to get it requires a doctors recommendation than testing for it must fall within the same considerations. When a veteran is pumped full of behavior modifiers, mood elevators and opiates for pain they have nothing to fear from drug testing but if they replace all of these with Medical Marijuana, they have new problems like finding a job especially for the federal government where many of them work. Whether directly or through a company that does work for the federal government that would require a "drug free" work environment in their contract. And what drug free really means is drugs not made by pharmaceutical companies. Until the country follows Arizona's lead and outlaw this practice what's the point.

Policy Change ?

As a VAMC patient I fail to understand why the States that don't allow Medical Marijuana aren't included in policy change -

Regional policy

This article is about a regional policy that affected Southern California and was in conflict with national policy. For other states, you could contact VMCA

med marajuan @ The VA

The govt. employees at the VA are liberals They don't like anyone who has ever picked up a gun including veterans. Maybe when the veterans accept the poor quality of healthcare provided, be politically correct the govt. employees might recommend med. marijuana. Veterans are hoping Trump gets elected and the govt. employees will start putting healthcare first and politic last and stop the affirmative action hiring practices which practically guarantees the bar is lowered and allegiance to liberals, secrecy