UPDATE 10/17: NIH’s Cancer.gov website now states: “Cannabinoids may have benefits in the treatment of cancer-related side effects.” It had said: “The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep.”
Also see: Government-Run Cancer Institute Quietly Acknowledges That Cannabis Kills Cancer Cells August 24, 2015
April 4, 2011 – The US National Cancer Institute, a branch of the National Institutes of Health, touts its website www.cancer.gov as presenting “Accurate, up-to-date, comprehensive cancer information from the U.S. government’s principal agency for cancer research.”
On March 17, NCI lived up to its mandate by publishing these two paragraphs on its Cannabis and Cannabinoids Physician Data Query (PDQ) General Information page for Health Professionals:
“The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. In the practice of integrative oncology, the health care provider may recommend medicinal Cannabis not only for symptom management but also for its possible direct antitumor effect.
“Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells but do not affect their nontransformed counterparts and may even protect them from cell death. These compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in glioma cells in culture and induce regression of glioma tumors in mice and rats.”
Activists have long waited for the US Government to acknowledge this information, known since 1974 and bolstered by current studies on cannabidiol (CBD) (e.g. a Spanish study in 2004 and a 2007 Harvard study).
After the blogosphere took note of NCI’s posting, the site was edited on March 30 to say only:
“The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. Though no relevant surveys of practice patterns exist, it appears that physicians caring for cancer patients who prescribe medicinal Cannabis predominantly do so for symptom management.”
In addition, NCI posted an explanation of its self-censorship, pointing out that “In light of the attention garnered by the PDQ summary statement on Cannabis and cannabinoids,” its Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Editorial Board “reexamined the recently posted statement and decided to change the wording.” It went further to state, “The summary statement represents an independent review of the literature; that review is not influenced by NCI or any other federal agency,” distancing itself from its PDQ editorial board.
NCI still posts the current evidence for the antitumor properties of Cannabis in the summary section titled Laboratory/Animal/Preclinical Studies, but those who don’t go further than the General Information page will miss the news, and there’s little to prompt any reader from going further than the Overview page, which merely says, “Cannabinoids may have benefits in the treatment of cancer-related side effects.”
Throughout the 8-page section, which covers history, human and clinical studies, and adverse effects, NCI gives the impression that only a handful of studies have been conducted on medical marijuana, which is true if you consider only the studies the US has actually allowed to take place. NORML has published a fourth edition of its pamphlet Emerging Clinical Applications for Cannabis and Cannabinoids, which reviews 200 preclinical and clinical studies published between 2000 and 2010, concluding that the components of cannabis may offer more than just symptomatic relief for other diseases too, like MS, Alzheimer’s and Lou Gehrig’s disease.
Starting with volunteering for Los Angeles NORML in 1992, I’ve been answering pleas for help from the victims of marijuana prohibition for nearly 20 years. Yesterday I heard from someone with prostate cancer, who wants to know all he can about CBD as a possible treatment, since his only other option is chemotherapy.
Sadly, I had to tell him that we are still years away from human studies or a compassionate national policy. Instead, our government impedes research into the potential health benefits of cannabinoids by denying researchers the plant or its “scheduled” components.
In 2007, DEA Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Mary Ellen Bittner
Another man wrote last week wanting to find a reputable oncologist in the Los Angeles area who could counsel him on medical marijuana use. I suggested he talk with his current doctor, armed with the NCI’s statement. But many doctors won’t find that information where the NCI has buried it.
Deputy Director, California NORML
UPDATE 5/27: Political Pressure Led to Cancer Claim Change, FOIA Emails Say
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) pressured the National Cancer Institute to take down a reference to marijuana’s potential ability to fight cancer tumors, The American Independent reported. Read more.